June 13, 2007 at 14:37 pm (
test)
is peace freedom is slavery, ignorance is force
quiet Ulises Ruiz, May 10, 2007
A year after the outbreak of the conflict teachers, Oaxaca is the mirror of Mexico. The process is advancing by leaps and bounds rightward, but also advances the rebellion that seeks and sometimes finds new ways. The poverty they live about 67% of the Oaxacan (2 million 349 000 570 people from a total of 3 million 506 thousand 821, according to official figures) and inequality "is a feature that they can not form an active part in society", according to the World Bank. [1] Crucible
indigenous and mestizo cultures in recent years, the state capital has become a huge showcase for tourists who provides money to local investors, domestic and foreign, but very little to ordinary citizens foot. With the arrival of Ulises Ruiz Ortiz (URO) for governor in late 2004, this situation was exacerbated by a renewed authoritarian cycle, characterized by the discretionary use of public resources, increased drug trafficking the destruction of historical and natural heritage, the harassment of independent media, and all kinds of repression. Clumsy and ruthless man, Ruiz Ortiz won at the polls, but, as Felipe Calderon, by way of fraud.
Far from being a remnant of the past, the despotism that prevails in Oaxaca summarizes and illustrates the sharp contradictions of contemporary Mexico. Some speak about it, a process latent fascism. [2] Without going into the debate, the fact is that the right wing oligarchy in archaic and modernization drives aggressive power and exclusion while at the same time, there emerges a social insurgency wide, unknown and threatening. This right goes for everything, does not seek legitimacy and agreements but merely enrich and perpetuate itself. In Oaxaca and elsewhere, the program is the same: to dismantle the last vestiges of the welfare state, subjecting the country to the needs of transnational capital and end with what smells right. The specific political and internal wars, which do exist, they matter little, beyond dispute as needed this right encompasses not only the PAN, but much of the PRI and even the so-called institutional left.
The perpetuation in office of URO and has received support from two executives consecutive federal (that of Vicente Fox and Felipe Calderón) do not clash with the national picture: the first months of the new PAN administration is characterized by the militarization of the country's main indigenous regions, numerous killings by the army and the application United States to implement in Mexico a "Plan Colombia" under the pretext of combating drug trafficking. [3]
Anyway, the first act of the governor was brand new trigger another war, this time against an independent newspaper, Noticias de Oaxaca, judged guilty of the crime of dissent. On June 17, 2005, thugs led by the PRI deputy and "union leader, David Aguilar, stormed the premises of the newspaper. The refusal of the newsroom to join a "strike", the attackers detained the 31 journalists present for more than a month. [6]
However, news because the hostages went out found a way to get information through Internet and the newspaper began printing in Tuxtepec, more than 200 miles from Oaxaca. When police ordered Ruiz Ortiz intercept the truck carrying it, its owner, Ericel Gómez, rented a plane for the newsboys be picked up at the airport, with the help of the teachers union. The dispute continued, the circulation dropped considerably, but ultimately survived News official harassment. Radicalized, yes, its editorial line by becoming the biggest selling newspaper entity. URO picking up his first loss.
Another characteristic event is the attack on Santiago Xanica, a Zapotec Indian community located in the Southern Highlands that for years fought for the respect of their collective rights. In December 2004, a few days of taking possession of URO, the army began to patrol the town and the January 15, 2005, the Preventive Police opened a crossfire against 80 Indians who were making a municipal cemetery near tequio. In the action was seriously wounded Abraham Ramírez Vázquez, leader of the Committee for the Defense of Indigenous Rights (CODEDI). Since the time of the murderers the victims are always guilty, the social activist was arrested without charge and to date is being held at the Pochutla. [7]
Soon after, URO embarked on a costly and environmentally harmful restructuring Oaxaca socket which earned him the antipathy of the local middle class, but allowed him to distribute huge amounts of money from their relatives.
the end of May 2006 in Oaxaca had about seventy political prisoners. Not satisfied, the governor opened fire on Section 22 of the National Union of Education Workers has about 70.000 members and a long tradition of independent struggle.
For years, in proximity to the Teachers' Day (May 15), teachers rented a camp in the center of the city to make their claims. The public complained, grumbled, but they rarely haggled sympathy. Catalysts of social consciousness, from dedicated and knowledgeable local deep reality, teachers are highly respected in the state.
On that occasion, called for the approval of his meager salary to national standards, a demand that also involved federal authorities. In the spring of 2006, however, closed all the doors of negotiation. URO launched threats trying to manipulate one of the factions of the movement against the other while the federal government disowned the case PAN is thought to strike and a blow to the PRI.
The camp started on May 22, without meeting much echo in the population. Emboldened, June 14, URO ordered their eviction relying on the element of surprise. Around 4:50 am, officers of several corporations backed by helicopters that dumped toxic grenades attacked the teachers with guns firing. In addition to causing panic among the public, the police destroyed everything they could, including the magisterial station facilities, "Radio encampment." The balance was about 200 injured and an unknown number missing. URO
and showed his willingness to tackle social discontent, as he had done weeks before the governor in Atenco PRI-also-the State of Mexico, Enrique Peña Nieto, with the enthusiastic cooperation of the federal executive PAN. [8] On the eve of the presidential election, the governor of Oaxaca, it sent the message of their leader, Roberto Madrazo, the PRI is the party of order. By then, elections were already bleeding.
Fire
What happened next illustrated once again that when the powerful are too eager to show just hurting their own interests. [9] The population that until then had remained passive, if not overtly hostile attitude changed pouring to the streets in solidarity with teachers.
They regrouped
facing the soldiers with stones and sticks, now aided by academics, civil society and ordinary citizens. Within hours, the angry crowd took up the socket reinstalling the camp despite URO. Then, the teachers ignored the governor, demanding, since that time, his resignation as a prerequisite and essential to resolve the dispute.
Day 16, a mega-march of about 300 thousand people showed the drag of the teachers. Citizens-students, parents, workers, bureaucrats and even, traders received them with applause, and when someone pulled out a banner that read "Ulysses was" everyone cheered.
The movement took a turn when, on 18 June, it announced the establishment of the People's Assembly of Oaxaca (APPO), which, in addition to teachers, some 350 organizations converged very nature varied: unions, collective libertarian groups on the left old Marxist-Leninist, civil society organizations, indigenous peoples, workers, artists, students and individuals without party affiliation. APPO emerged and initiative of teachers as a way of channeling social support to their protest movement, but soon surpassed. On day 20, its members agreed to create an interim collective leadership made up of thirty people posing form a common front "to initiate a prolonged struggle to achieve the disappearance of powers, the removal of Ulises Ruiz Ortiz and the arrival of popular power." [10]
While the term "People power" may upset by evoking historical experiences, expressed the idea of \u200b\u200btransforming the living conditions of laying the foundations for a new relationship between society and government. Soon
Anyway, job demands had already passed in the background before the demand for Ruiz's ouster, which in turn raised demand for democratization.
According Gustavo Esteva, within APPO together three different democratic struggles. [12] The first formal struggle for democracy: how to improve the conditions of representation, how to stop cheating and fraud in the electoral system, to limit manipulation of the media and ensure proper functioning of the institutions of rule of law. These demands are very strong in Oaxaca and highly visible within the APPO. Raises a second stream of participatory democracy, ie the strengthening of the popular initiative, the institution of legal figures of the referendum and the plebiscite, the possibility of revoking the mandates and the choice of what is called participatory budgeting, or the public services are made with the participation of citizens and not arbitrary. The third, radical democracy could be named said: we do not need up there is no political power, we need forms of administrative coordination, but nothing more. This current struggle for a society in which the origin of the law lies in the individual and collective autonomy of all human beings. It is a cross-current in Mexico is based on the experience of indigenous peoples, but also in urban struggles and anarchism.
What David has to do with the demand for self-organization and self-government of the masses who joined the movement and the aspiration to create a new world from the bowels of the old. In addition to explaining the overflow of trade unions and Marxist-Leninist these aspirations are still the best guarantee that the threat of fascism comes across a barrier.
The party
What followed is a story narrated complex and still the only interests us here review some milestones. From the beginning, the APPO was inspired by the democratic practices of the Zapotec, Mixtec, Mixe, Amuzgo and other peoples. For this, he soon changed his name somewhat anachronistic-in "People's Assembly (the singular) for" People's Popular Assembly "(the plural), which involves several purposes. If the idea of \u200b\u200b"assembly" meant self-management forms which remain in force in 80 percent of the 570 municipalities in Oaxaca, so it was necessary to note that these assemblies have multiple and diverse expressions.
state capital itself is, among other things, an Indian metropolis since several of its colonies are built mainly by migrants going to and from their hometowns. Many of them joined the protests, some were teachers, more artisans and vendors. [14] Upon learning the facts, communities also joined bringing his vast experience and unflagging of grievances, poverty, oppression, marginalization, chiefdom, dispossession, neglect ...
Along came urban youth whose collective identity is constructed the neighborhood, music, clothing and art. "Marginalized and discriminated groups, not only by the government, as a prostitute @ s, gays, lesbians and other loves, were present, albeit discreet" making "the wrongs they suffer ell @ s were part of the collective cry for justice and freedom for tod @ s ". [15]
star
festive appearance suggests, I think, the only relevant comparison with the Paris Commune, which, in turn, was defined as the biggest party of the nineteenth century. Should add that the Commune of Oaxaca was cut like his illustrious predecessor: there was in Mexico-nor out-large demonstrations in favor of the APPO.
should be added that the people of Oaxaca do not speak of "commune" but of "commonality", a term that refers to the local indigenous experiences. Anyway, it is clear that the boys from the barricades, which held the street fighting, were not "professional" and militants in the traditional sense. Were pure people-including street children as seen in a video of the collective evil eye [22] - people who knew nothing about urban warfare and the training in the heat of the facts.
And now?
The APPO is the result of a long process of accumulation of historical experiences, successes and errors, which converge in the common goal of democratizing the structures of power. Even when he saw the contents of that democratization is in dispute, the truth is that it was the axis that brought together a multifaceted movement that can not be understood from the traditional analysis of a sociological or Marxist.
"What is outlined in Oaxaca is in the line of continuity of the Paris Commune and the communities of Andalusia, Catalonia and Aragon created during the English revolution of 1936-1938, in which self-management experience laid the groundwork for a new society, "Raoul Vaneigem wrote in an appeal for international solidarity published in Mexico by La Jornada. [23]
The best source about that report remains the CCIODH the conclusions read as follows: "The Commission considers that the events in Oaxaca are a link in a legal strategy, police and military, with psychosocial and community whose goal last is to control and intimidate the civilian population in areas where processes are developed civic organization or social movements, non-partisan character. " [24]
participated in the experience and I bear witness that this conclusion is only moderate, but even it falls short to reality. While we found that there were at least 23 victims until the second fortnight of January 2007 (all on the side of motion), we could not document the large number of missing there since the beginning of the conflict. Why? Because terror is such that people did not dare to report the disappearance of their relatives, even before an as reliable as CCIODH.
Mexico City, June 10, 2007
[1] Quoted in Luis Arellano Mora, "Oaxaca: Poverty in figures"
http://www.transicionoaxaca.com.mx/index.php?option = com_content & task = view & id = 42 & Itemid = 75
[3] La Jornada, June 9, 2007. See the paradigmatic cases of rape and murder of the old Ernestina Ascension in Sierra de Zongolica, Veracruz (La Jornada 27 February) and the slaughter of a family of 5 people in Sinaloa. guilty of "not having stopped at a checkpoint" (La Jornada, June 3).
[4] See International Civil Commission for Human Rights Observation (CCIODH), Report on the events in Oaxaca, http://cciodh.pangea.org/quinta/informe_oaxaca_cas.shtml
[6] Interview with Sanmartín Ismael Hernández, editor of Noticias de Oaxaca, December 29, 2006,
[7] See mexico.indymedia.org / tiki-download_file.php?
[9] For this I relied rapid reconstruction in my own interviews, the report on Oaxaca, op. cit. and the story of Gustavo Esteva on the occasion of the Meeting of analysis of the social movement in Oaxaca. Dialogue between members of civil organizations and academic institutions in Oaxaca and Mexico City, Universidad de la Tierra, Oaxaca, March 18, 2007.
[10] La Jornada, June 19, 2006.[11] Interview with Miguel Linares Rivera, by Hernán Ouviña, Mexico City, October 29, 2006, http://www.espacioalternativo.org/node/1731
[12] Interview with Gustavo Esteva, University Earth, Oaxaca, November 3, 2006 [13] David Venegas Reyes, "Alebrije", letter from Ixcotel, April 23, 2007, http://chiapas.indymedia.org/display.php3?article_id=144954
[14] Interview with Nicephorus Urbieta, May 3, 2007.
[15] David Venegas, letter cited.
[16] In indigenous communities, the "topiles" are elected assembly and free exercise of justice by baton and without carrying weapons.
[17] This led to the angry criticism of an anarchist group that was at the APPO movement of the petty bourgeoisie (¡!). See: "Oaxaca: APPO and reformism as usual" http://argentina.indymedia.org/news/2006/11/463625.php
[18] Miguel Linares Rivera, interview cited.
[19] Interview with Flavio Sosa, November 4, 2006.
[20] G. Esteva, interview cited.
[21] Interview with Dr. Berta Muñoz, Oaxaca, Ciudad Universitaria, November 3, 2006.
[22] This group has done an outstanding job of collecting the events in Oaxaca. See http://video.indymedia.org/en/2006/11/555.shtml
[23] Raoul Vaneigem, "Call of a partisan of individual and collective autonomy", La Jornada, November 11, 2006.
[24] CCIODH, "Conclusions and preliminary recommendations" http://cciodh.pangea.org/quinta/070120_inf_conclusiones_recomendaciones_cas.shtml.
[25] Armando Bartra, "The size of the challenges," Guillotine No. 56, Spring 2007.
[26] 11-12 November 2006, local SITUAM, Mexico City.
[27] David Venegas, letter of May 15, 2007,
http://www.vocal.lunasexta.org/davidvenegas/carta-de-david-15-de-mayo.html
[28] La Jornada, April 14, 2007.
[29] David Venegas, April 23, letter cited.
0 comments:
Post a Comment